Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1950

reference
30-tree-1
name
1950
tree-preservation-order

undefined

30-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.937856 50.849429)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.937800 50.849423,-0.937802 50.849434,-0.937810 50.849444,-0.937822 50.849452,-0.937838 50.849458,-0.937856 50.849459,-0.937873 50.849458,-0.937889 50.849453,-0.937902 50.849445,-0.937910 50.849435,-0.937913 50.849424,-0.937911 50.849413,-0.937903 50.849403,-0.937890 50.849395,-0.937875 50.849389,-0.937857 50.849388,-0.937840 50.849389,-0.937824 50.849394,-0.937811 50.849402,-0.937803 50.849412,-0.937800 50.849423)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL